Austrian Grand Prix bosses quietly found an answer to F1’s biggest controversy

Follow us on Google Discover

In 2023, Formula 1, the FIA, and Austrian Grand Prix organizers faced a major problem: over the course of 71 laps, drivers violated track limits on at least 1,200 different occasions. Stewards were left sorting out penalties for hours after the race, leading to changes to the final standings and a whole lot of outcry from fans.

Race organizers at the Red Bull Ring couldn’t afford a repeat, which prompted them to introduce a slew of different measures designed to more efficiently deal with track limits violations: A wide blue line was painted around the track to better demarcate the limits of the track, cameras were trained at offending corners, and an AI software was created that could discern when all four of a driver’s wheels left the racing surface rather than just one or two wheels in order to ensure stewards only had to review genuinely problematic off-track forays.

Check the results for the 2026 Austrian Grand Prix, and you’ll find that there were no post-race penalties applied for track limits violations. In fact, there were no in-race penalties for track limits violations. The only driver who even came close to securing one was Kimi Antonelli thanks only to the fact that an uncomfortable brake bias saw him overshoot three major corners in the first two laps of the race.

So, how did a track once prone to over 1,200 violations whittle them down to nothing? It wasn’t thanks to paint or technology. The simplest and most effective deterrent was, simply, installing 2.5-meter strips of gravel beyond the exit kerbs at the offending corners.

Just like that, the problem was solved. The fine folks at the Red Bull Ring had discovered the answer to a problem that had mystified stewards and fans for years. A problem that, ironically, stemmed from Formula 1’s constant efforts to innovate.

Don’t hold back: how would you rate the Austrian Grand Prix?

Comment

Like or Comment

Have your say Sign-in now for free

Track limits: Formula 1’s newest controversy

In all 76 years of Formula 1’s history as a world championship, there have been plenty of controversies surrounding engineering decisions, track preparation, and the implementation of new technologies to either aid or limit drivers.

Track limits evolved out of that constant push to make motorsport safer.

Of course, every race track in all of history has had limits, and no one felt a need to enforce them. That’s because those limits were naturally defined; if a driver ran wide, he would hit a barrier, a hay bale, a tree, or a grassy knoll. The repercussions of such collisions were massive and ranged from something as simple as causing yourself race-compromising damage to that most sinister consequence: death.

As Formula 1 evolved, the tolerance for death lessened, and the folks in charge of F1, the FIA, and the individual circuits began to implement major changes designed to reduce danger. Walls and barriers were removed or redesigned. Trackside patches of grass were covered with gravel designed to slow cars at high speeds, and when that gravel became too dangerous, it was necessary to pave the non-racing surfaces of a track.

The problem is that if you provide drivers with a space on which to race, they’re going to race on it!

Many circuits had long utilized raised kerbs to direct the flow of traffic, but those became even more of a necessity, alongside painted lines depicting the intended racing surface. But the presence of a kerb or a line does not mean a driver will avoid that area if he feels it will give him an advantage, which prompted the creation of time penalties designed to discourage drivers from doing so.

Track limits violations are defined as an instance where all four of a car’s tyres leave the intended racing surface, and in a grand prix, drivers are allowed three such incidents before they’re shown the black-and-white flag. Upon a fourth incident, drivers receive a five-second penalty. If they exceed track limits a fifth time, they’ll receive a 10-second penalty.

Again, this was a punishment simply unheard of in Formula 1 for decades. The mere act of driving off the track would have been punishment enough, and that alone kept drivers from doing so.

Why punishment is not as effective as prevention

When Formula 1 drivers exceeded track limits over 1,200 times at the 2023 Austrian Grand Prix, it forced FIA stewards and track designers to think hard about why this problem was happening and how to most effectively remedy it.

Implementing cameras and AI software to better track each incident and reduce the load on stewards was a good first step, but it was likely clear to stewards that, with so many penalties handed out after Austria in 2023, they’d still have a lot of work to do. It would be much better, then, to actively discourage violations.

And there is, simply, no better consequence than a natural and immediate consequence. A well-placed strip or two of gravel, in this case at Turns 9 and 10, forced drivers to adopt a different racing line altogether. If they violated track limits in those areas, it was no longer on the stewards to deal with. The driver would have known he had erred, and he would have approached that corner differently in the future.

It may sound silly, but all high-performance athletes search for ways to improve at their craft, and for racing drivers, that often means cutting corners that can be cut, whether consciously or subconsciously. If that corner can no longer be cut, then drivers will no longer cut it. Simple as that.

Formula 1 should always sit at the pinnacle of technology in the racing sphere, and that means transformation is inevitable. But as we’ve learned from the track limits situation at the Austrian Grand Prix, sometimes the answer doesn’t require a tech-heavy approach. Sometimes, it requires us to go back to basics.